Place open
|
63 / 96
|
Place in category
|
22 / 32 |
Place by sex
|
62 / 91 |
Number
|
1133 |
Result
|
02:34:08 |
Loss to winner
|
00:32:45 |
Result better than
|
33 (34.4%) competitors
|
Result in category better than
|
10 (31.3%) competitors
|
Result by sex better than
|
29 (31.9%) competitors
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
Split times
|
Name |
Independently |
In total |
0-17km |
00:47:40
(62)
|
00:47:40
(62)
|
17-26km |
00:26:50
(59)
|
01:14:30
(59)
|
26-43km |
00:49:45
(68)
|
02:04:15
(64)
|
44-54km |
00:29:53
(63)
|
02:34:08
(63)
|
|
|
|
Place open
|
49 / 79
|
Place in category
|
21 / 29 |
Place by sex
|
48 / 73 |
Number
|
1052 |
Result
|
02:57:52 |
Loss to winner
|
00:49:25 |
Result better than
|
30 (38%) competitors
|
Result in category better than
|
8 (27.6%) competitors
|
Result by sex better than
|
25 (34.2%) competitors
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
Split times
|
Name |
Independently |
In total |
0-19km |
01:01:45
(48)
|
01:01:45
(48)
|
19-27km |
00:23:07
(47)
|
01:24:52
(47)
|
27-46km |
01:08:43
(49)
|
02:33:35
(47)
|
46-54km |
00:24:15
(44)
|
02:57:50
(49)
|
|
|
|
Place open
|
52 / 61
|
Place in category
|
22 / 25 |
Place by sex
|
50 / 58 |
Number
|
1052 |
Result
|
02:16:42 |
Loss to winner
|
00:28:34 |
Result better than
|
9 (14.8%) competitors
|
Result in category better than
|
3 (12%) competitors
|
Result by sex better than
|
8 (13.8%) competitors
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
Split times
|
Name |
Independently |
In total |
0-16km |
00:35:16
(34)
|
00:35:16
(33)
|
16-26km |
00:36:09
(61)
|
01:11:25
(57)
|
26-42km |
00:37:38
(42)
|
01:49:03
(52)
|
42-52km |
00:27:39
(43)
|
02:16:42
(52)
|
|
|
|
Place open
|
38 / 78
|
Place in category
|
16 / 30 |
Place by sex
|
37 / 74 |
Number
|
1052 |
Result
|
02:33:30 |
Loss to winner
|
00:30:25 |
Result better than
|
40 (51.3%) competitors
|
Result in category better than
|
14 (46.7%) competitors
|
Result by sex better than
|
37 (50%) competitors
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
Split times
|
Name |
Independently |
In total |
0-11km |
00:30:06
(41)
|
00:30:06
(41)
|
11-39km |
01:15:41
(36)
|
01:45:47
(39)
|
39-56km |
00:47:43
(39)
|
02:33:30
(38)
|
|
|
|
Place open
|
35 / 78
|
Place in category
|
11 / 28 |
Place by sex
|
35 / 73 |
Number
|
1083 |
Result
|
02:56:21 |
Loss to winner
|
00:43:13 |
Result better than
|
43 (55.1%) competitors
|
Result in category better than
|
17 (60.7%) competitors
|
Result by sex better than
|
38 (52.1%) competitors
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
Split times
|
Name |
Independently |
In total |
0-10km |
00:33:49
(41)
|
00:33:49
(41)
|
10-25km |
00:50:21
(32)
|
01:24:10
(33)
|
25-35km |
00:40:19
(46)
|
02:04:29
(41)
|
35-50km |
00:51:52
(30)
|
02:56:21
(35)
|
|
|
|
Place open
|
76 / 160
|
Place in category
|
21 / 35 |
Place by sex
|
75 / 152 |
Number
|
628 |
Result
|
02:34:29 |
Loss to winner
|
00:38:53 |
Result better than
|
84 (52.5%) competitors
|
Result in category better than
|
14 (40%) competitors
|
Result by sex better than
|
77 (50.7%) competitors
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
Split times
|
Name |
Independently |
In total |
Czas po pętli nr 1 |
01:14:38
(67)
|
01:14:38
(67)
|
|
|
|
Place open
|
68 / 168
|
Place in category
|
18 / 35 |
Place by sex
|
67 / 160 |
Number
|
434 |
Result
|
03:02:08 |
Loss to winner
|
00:47:10 |
Result better than
|
100 (59.5%) competitors
|
Result in category better than
|
17 (48.6%) competitors
|
Result by sex better than
|
93 (58.1%) competitors
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
Split times
|
Name |
Independently |
In total |
Czas po pętli nr 1 |
01:28:04
(77)
|
01:28:04
(77)
|
|
|
|
Place open
|
123 / 214
|
Place in category
|
25 / 44 |
Place by sex
|
119 / 202 |
Number
|
188 |
Result
|
02:19:28 |
Loss to winner
|
00:34:29 |
Result better than
|
91 (42.5%) competitors
|
Result in category better than
|
19 (43.2%) competitors
|
Result by sex better than
|
83 (41.1%) competitors
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
|
Place open
|
35 / 56
|
Place in category
|
14 / 21 |
Place by sex
|
35 / 54 |
Number
|
27 |
Result
|
02:24:51 |
Loss to winner
|
00:29:46 |
Result better than
|
21 (37.5%) competitors
|
Result in category better than
|
7 (33.3%) competitors
|
Result by sex better than
|
19 (35.2%) competitors
|
|